THE AFTERMATH OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CHALLENGES THE AUSTRALIAN LAWMAKERS

After the outcome of the same-sex-marriage survey, Labor Party, Greens Party and the homosexual movement including Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull are the winners, but Liberals, One Nation party, Nationals Party, all religions and the major natural couple are losers. Despite the homosexual component is the minority, therefore, Labor and Greens back and influence into the parliament house. Nevertheless, the same-sex-marriage legislation is not the prior national interest while the economy (deep deficit), national security, employment seems to abandon. Under the pressure of Labor, actually, opposition leader Bill Shorten and Senator Penny Wong is Labor’s leader in Senate and the same-sex-marriage legislation pushed the ruling government spent $AU 122 million for the postal survey and aftermath, the lawmaker of Upper and Lower House have been facing the new challenge, because the bill introduces must debate carefully before approving the law and validated. Nevertheless, after the outcome announced, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull told more than $AU 20 million left over from the same-sex marriage postal survey that should be directed to the mental health and the other services for the Gay who suffered by the campaign NO and Greens Party leader is Dr. Richard Di Natale chimed, he called Prime Minister increases the funding. Certainly, the spending is the taxpayers, not Malcolm Turnbull and Dr. Richard Di Natale’s pocket. In the past, the government compensated $AU 70 million for asylum seeker and $AU 20 million of the legal fees for Slater & Gordon Law Firm, it is the great success of the wonderful Australian human rights lawyer and the excellent Australian High court judge. The lawyer and asylum seeker are the jackpot winners but the Australian taxpayers are the losers.
The same-sex-marriage movement and Labor, Green rush the law applies quickly, they believe it will be passed before Christmas. Therefore the same-sex-marriage legalization is like the atomic bomb exploded by the postal survey in Australia, it is going to destroy the society and eradicate the social valuation.
The multiple million years of human history, the people exist by the male and female, even the animal has to force the natural law, if not the people have no meat, cheese, milk and the other living facilities. The tree follows the natural law, the male and female flowers created the fruit. The same-sex-marriage legalization could uproot the social foundation and the law would affect into multiple fields are such as the family law, civil law, Centrelink payment, immigration law, religious freedom, the children, school, social problem, culture and many problems facing.
The same-sex-marriage legalization is not likely the fast food or 5 minutes noodle, but the same-sex marriage radically changes the society, law, family…the introducing bill must consider and debate carefully before it becomes the law. The homosexuality is the social abnormal impact and it is the first time is going to be lawful in Australia, so the debate could avoid the serious problems after the law applies. The same-sex-marriage legalization will be able to wipe out the social fundament and the affect deeply into the legal system, social courtesy, it is like a plot of fire that burns the jungle. The Australian lawmakers have to build the foundation strongly before applying the law. As a house needs the foundation before building, so before the same-sex-marriage law applying, the lawmakers have to prepare the foundation. Labor and Greens cause the asylum seeker’s dilemma, they must share the responsibility for multiple billion dollars of taxpayers wasted and now the same-sex-marriage legislation will create the serious consequences to the society. Labor, Greens and the supporters company with the complications after the law applying.
The homosexual person couldn’t distinguish between the natural couple and the homosexual couple, so the law needs to confirm clearly:
1-The law recognizes the homosexual recipient: the recognition between natural and homosexual people are different, so the homosexual recipient could register in a department (It should be the Homosexual Department if Labor rules government, Senator Penny Wong suits for the minister). If not, the same-sex-marriage law should be exploited, it is the loophole.
2-The conflict between same-sex marriage and religious freedom: the homosexuality opposes against the religion and the faith. Nevertheless, the religion is the majority and has thousand years of history. The democratic principle doesn’t allow the minority wins over the majority, the election confirms the major votes is a winner. Therefore, the homosexuality defeated the majority of natural couple and religion, the homosexuality is invincible in the democracy. The Australia respects free speech, free choice, so the homosexuality is the free choice of the minority, but they impose the individual choice on the majority and the nation. The same-sex-marriage law needs to protect the religious freedom, the church, temple, and the mosque have the freedom to deny a homosexual couple celebrates the wedding. If not, the religion would be charged by the breaking law and lawyer has plenty clients are the religion versus the homosexual couples and the law school needs to reform the law amendment that deserves the homosexuality.
3-The immigration law will be complicated: the same-sex espouse could migrate under the family reunion category. Therefore, the applicant must register the sex status in Australia and the espouse from the other country needs to certify the homosexual status in their own sate. The same-sex-marriage migrated must have the witnesses who guarantor the couple are not fraud and live together. The immigration’s loophole law is an opportunity for the people smuggle and the fraudster could make the profit.
4-The social culture has been beaten from the fundament: the titles of Mr or Mrs couldn’t recognize, actually the administrative procedures have to change in the most major forms are such as Centrelink, insurance, health, vehicle registration and many changes.
There are just some complications will occur if the same-sex-marriage law applying, so the Australian lawmakers have to work out and very hard work for the totally changes the society, law, education, and culture. While opposition Bill Shorten of Labor Party and Greens leader is Dr. Richard Di Natale rush the law applying, but they ignore the serious consequences are waiting and inevitable. Opposition Bill Shorten claims the democracy when the law needing to debate carefully. The democracy doesn’t accept the minority wins over the majority, but the same-sex-marriage wons over the majority, including the religion and human history.

2 thoughts on “THE AFTERMATH OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CHALLENGES THE AUSTRALIAN LAWMAKERS

  1. In the aftermath of last week’s Supreme Court ruling on Obergefell, I have engaged in some online debates with people of goodwill regarding the issue of same-sex marriage.

  2. And yes, I believe that there are overwhelmingly compelling and powerful arguments against incest and polygamy that do not apply in any argument against same-sex marriage.

Comments are closed.