After losing the election in 2013, the Labor government left over the deep debt ever and also 52,000 asylum seekers to Coalition government. During 6 years under the rule of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard (2007-2013), Labor government seemed deeply influenced by the Greens (viral party) and its allies as the Refugee Action Group, the so-called human rights activists, and some left politicians (mostly the hungry ballot politicians and their electoral unit has many Muslim). The asylum seeker is the vestige of Labor Party that causes of the Australian taxpayers have burdened multiple billion dollars a year, excluded the national security threat and the other serious problems being controversial as Sharia Law, Burqa, and Allah food certified, the public argument. The Australia detention camp meets the international standard accommodation for the detainee, the camp provides the food, health, and the other facilities. It compares with the former refugee Vietnam lived at the camps in Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand and nowadays, the refugee camp in the Middle East, Africa….certainly, the asylum seekers in Australia are very lucky. As the evidence of detention camp at Northam (Western Australia) cost $AUD 125 million just for 600 illegal migrants, the accommodation is better than the Australian soldier fighting in Afghanistan and the homeless. The asylum seekers in Australia also have a mobile phone, they could contact with their supporters outside. Therefore, sometimes, the asylum seeker rioted, burned down the camp and outside the Greens Party (prominence is Senator Sarah Hanson Young, the nickname is Black Crow), the Refugee Action Group, the human rights lawyers are the strong supporters, the government properties damaged that cost multiple million dollars of the taxpayers. Even the asylum seekers moved to Nauru, Manu Islands but the supporters still raised the voice, the protests, actually every time an asylum seeker has died, they demonstrated and vigil as a national hero. Probably, they have not done with their parent funeral, so the asylum seeker in Australia is very lucky. Moreover, the cost of the airplane is not cheap for an asylum seeker being sick.
The asylum seeker is the unwanted problem but it becomes the dilemma of the incumbent government. Nevertheless, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull who has the Liberals skin covers Labor organ, his stance is unclear despite he is the leader of a conservative party, the loyal Liberals worry the future of party since Mr. Malcolm Turnbull seized the power. On the other hand, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull couldn’t solve the asylum seeker, indeed he has tried to revive a deal that promised by former President Barrack Obama with 1,250 asylum seekers resettle in the US. Therefore, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was called” dumb deal” by President Donald Trump while the White House orders the travel ban. Moreover, the asylum seekers coming to the US that conflicts with the border protection policy of Donald Trump. Nevertheless, the Australian leader couldn’t exchange the national interest with 1,250 asylum seekers, it couldn’t affect the long term ally between two countries, actually, and the security agencies don’t know who they are. Whatever, the terror occurred on Australia soil that raises the grave concern for government, certainly, the US knew the source, it is a strong reason the US doesn’t want the asylum seeker to resettle. The Australia government refuses the asylum seekers, why does Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull pass to the US? The Aussie leader ignores the common courtesy between two countries so Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull couldn’t convince the US carries out the asylum seeker deal. Certainly, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull couldn’t bully President Donald Trump in the dumb deal.
The asylum seeker harms the Australia interest, recently the human rights lawyers of Slater & Gordon law firm succeeded in the high court action that ordered the Australian government compensates $ 70 million for the illegal invaders in Nauru, the human rights turn human wrong, the legal system being rotten and contained the loopholes. The Australian has never invited the asylum seeker, they illegally intruded and now the Aussie taxpayers have to pay by the court order, who are the judges? Where does the lawyer stand? Where is the patriotic concern of lawyer and judge? What do they serve for? Moreover, the Australia government also has already offered given $AUD 25,000 if who volunteers returning homeland. What is going on?
Despite the asylum seeker dealt on the diplomatic language after Vice President Mike Pence visits Australia, but the US has no interest. Therefore, as the diplomatic attitude, they sent a delegation to Nauru and recently the US officials halted the interview and left Nauru two weeks early. It is a signal of the asylum seeker’s resettlement in the US being doubted and also reflects the concern of White House. However, the Australia government covers up the failure, actually, Foreign Minister Julie Bishop refuses the impact, she confirms the deal is going on, but when will the asylum seekers resettle in the US?
During the Coalition faces the domestic struggle in Liberals and the Malcolm Turnbull’s credit being downed badly, the next election should push the Liberals to lose government, so any failure to be covered up and mitigates, but the asylum seeker is not easy to solve despite the Australia government accepted to pay the massive compensation and the returning money. The illegal migrant is the good business, the people smugglers as Ahmad Zia Alizadah, Afghanistan, who runs a syndicate in Indonesia with more than 200 asylum seekers came to Australia, he made profit is up to $USD 2,000,000, each asylum seeker paid at least $USD 10, 0000, but in Australia, many low-income families couldn’t save couple thousand dollars, so the asylum seeker is wealthy than Australia. On July 2017, Ahmad Zia Alizadah extradited from Indonesia to Australia (one again, the Aussie taxpayers cover the legal cost and his accommodation in prison camp). While the Australia engages the deep debt estimates up to a trillion dollars, the public interests needed as homeless recipients are up hundred thousand, the hospital waiting list and the other social issues, but why does government care too much for the aliens? The A&Q fact check reveals the asylum seeker cost Australia $AUD 100 million a year in welfare with an unemployment rate of 97%.
Australia or Aussie, Down Under prides the lucky country, but there are much unlucky Australian as homeless (hundred thousand), deep debt, the terror threat…but the asylum seeker is very lucky, they pay nothing tax but afforded than the Australia citizen. The UN just imposes the Australia and the other Western countries resettle the asylum seeker, but UN has no responsibility when the asylum seeker turns terrorist. The UN members should review the role of United Nation and overhaul the refugee scheme, the humanitarian program to be exploited by the people smuggle.