Communist regimes are the enemies of free speech and free information coming from democratic countries. The people live in the hell of a communist paradise, with the voices of the people and the truth suppressed, despite fake news media companies supporting the communist regimes and the left-wing party. China’s Communist regime has absolutely banned free speech since 1949. In Vietnam, the Viet Cong became the enemy of free speech, reflecting the proverb as” Eating like a prisoner, sleeping like a Buddhist monk, and speaking like the national leader”. Despite democratic countries respecting free speech in their constitutions. Therefore, the mongrel communist parties exploited the power to limit free speech, such as China’s Communist Party, and the Viet Cong established the firewall to prevent impartial information; the communist regimes labeled the counter-revolutionary media and the platforms.
In Australia, the ALP, or the Australian Leninist Party, follows China, but the ALP and the puppet Prime Minister Anthony Albanese used the majority of Labor to vote for the bill, as the French proverb Le mouton De Panurge”. Australia has banned social media for children under 16, while France has implemented a ban for children under 15. These measures aim to protect young people from the harmful effects of digital content; however, the hypocritical sophistication couldn’t convince the people, despite the Australian parliament, with a majority of Labor members, passing the bill. In November 2024, Australia’s federal parliament passed the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act, which requires social media companies such as Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and X (formerly Twitter) to take reasonable steps to prohibit minors under the age of 16 from owning accounts. The law prevents internet access because the mongrel communist party feared the internet.
The limited age is the first stage, and the next step will be a ban if Labor continues to rule the country in the next election. YouTube was originally excluded; however, it was later included, and companies that do not comply can be fined up to 50 million AUD, and it is enforced by the eSafety Commissioner. The ban came into effect on 10 December 2025; Australia then became the first country in the world to ban social media, banning platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, X, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitch, Kick, Threads and Reddit for individuals under 16. This meant that anyone over 16 must verify their age using methods such as facial scan or ID to create, log in to, or continue using accounts by 10 December 2025” (cited from Wikipedia)
On 9 March 2026, Australia became the second country in the world to enforce age verification on social networks such as adult sites, search engines, online platforms like X that have allowed harmful content, online chats from Xbox, PlayStation, and even on games such as GTA. Apps rated 18+ and AI Chatbots that allow explicit material also became affected by this enforced age verification. The left-wing television networks such as ABC, Channel Seven, Channel Nine, Channel Ten, and SBS used the decoy parents to support the untold firewall of the mongrel communist government of incompetent Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. The Labor government went too far; they filed legal action against Elon Musk. Unfortunately, Anthony Albanese lost in the US Federal Court; the outcome for mongrel communist emperor Anthony Albanese is the news below:
“Elon Musk’s X has defeated Australia’s eSafety Commissioner in the Federal Court, with Justice Elizabeth Raper ruling the regulator could not impose a second online-safety regime on the platform simply because it also offers private messaging.
X is already regulated as a “social media service” under the Online Safety Act 2021. eSafety argued its messaging functions also made it a “relevant electronic service”, exposing the platform to another set of obligations under a separate industry standard.
Justice Raper rejected that interpretation on 12 August 2026, finding the Act was structured around distinct categories of online services. The ruling means the Relevant Electronic Services Standard does not apply to X.
The standard carries serious obligations covering material including child sexual exploitation, extreme violence and terrorism, with potential penalties of up to $49.5 million. X remains subject to Australia’s social-media safety rules. What failed was eSafety’s attempt to extend an additional regulatory regime over the same platform.
The Albanese government did not create eSafety or the Online Safety Act, but it has continued backing and expanding Australia’s online-safety regulatory system. This judgment is a reminder that regulatory power still has legal limits.
X challenged eSafety’s interpretation and won”
The incident showed the thick head of the Labor regime; the public pressured them to pay for the inappropriate legal action/.
(thedawnmedia.com)